'Racism' of early colour photography explored in
art exhibition
Artists spent a month in South Africa
taking pictures on decades-old film engineered with only white faces in mind
 
'Kodak Shirley' cards used for
calibrating skin tones in photographs were named after the first model featured.
Photograph: Adam Broomberg And Oliver Chanarin/Goodman Gallery

Can the camera be racist? The question is explored in an exhibition that
reflects on how Polaroid built an efficient tool for South Africa's apartheid regime to photograph and
police black people.


The London-based artists Adam Broomberg and Oliver Chanarin spent a month
in South Africa taking pictures on decades-old film
that had been engineered with only white faces in mind. They used Polaroid's
vintage ID-2 camera, which had a "boost" button to increase the flash – enabling
it  to be used to photograph black people for the notorious passbooks, or "dompas", that allowed the state to control their
movements.


The result was raw snaps of some of the country's most beautiful flora and
fauna from regions such as the Garden Route and the Karoo, an attempt by the
artists to subvert what they say was the camera's original, sinister intent.


Broomberg and Chanarin say their work, on show at Johannesburg's Goodman Gallery, examines "the radical notion
that prejudice might be inherent in the medium of photography
itself". They argue that early colour film was predicated on white skin: in
1977, when Jean-Luc Godard was invited on an assignment to Mozambique, he
refused to use Kodak film on the grounds that the stock was inherently
"racist".


The light range was so narrow, Broomberg said, that "if you exposed film for
a white kid, the black kid sitting next to him would be rendered invisible
except for the whites of his eyes and teeth". It was only when Kodak's two
biggest clients – the confectionary and furniture industries – complained that
dark chocolate and dark furniture were losing out that it came up with a
solution.


The artists feel certain that the ID-2 camera and its boost button were
Polaroid's answer to South Africa's very specific need.  "Black skin absorbs 42%
more light. The button boosts the flash exactly 42%," Broomberg explained. "It
makes me believe it was designed for this purpose."


In 1970 Caroline Hunter, a young chemist working for Polaroid in America,
stumbled upon evidence that the company was effectively supporting apartheid.
She and her partner Ken Williams formed the Polaroid Workers Revolutionary
Movement and campaigned for a boycott. By 1977 Polaroid had withdrawn from South Africa, spurring an
international divestment movement that was crucial to bringing down
apartheid.


The title of the exhibition, To Photograph the Details of a Dark Horse in Low
Light, refers to the coded phrase used by Kodak to describe a new film stock
created in the early 1980s to address the inability of earlier films to
accurately render dark skin.


The show also features norm reference cards that always used white women as a
standard for measuring and calibrating skin tones when printing photographs. The
series of "Kodak Shirleys" were named after the first model featured. Today such
cards show multiple races.


Broomberg and Chanarin made two recent trips to Gabon to photograph a series
of rare Bwiti initiation rituals using Kodak film stock, scavenged from eBay,
that had expired in 1978. Working with outdated chemical processes, they
salvaged just a single frame. Broomberg said: "Anything that comes out of that
camera is a political document. If I take a shot of the carpet, that's a
political document."

http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2013/jan/25/racism-colour-photography-exhibition



Leave a Reply.